The Convergence Newsletter From Newsplex at the University of South Carolina Vol. VI No. 8 (June 2009) By Robert Pyle, Editor Cyber social networking is helping to fuel the current Iranian protest against recent election results. But with Iran’s government trying to stem the opposition’s mobilization by actively removing opposition Web sites and attempting to slow down social networking portals such as Facebook and Twitter, the world is being deprived of information concerning this major political movement. Iranian censorship of the Internet is not unique. The Chinese government tried to shut down dissidents’ online use at the time of Tiananmen. Other nations face such roadblocks to cyber information. This issue of The Convergence Newsletter offers two articles examining problems of Internet access in Ethiopia. We also present a study focusing on India’s use of media, examining how and where convergence in that country takes place. View past newsletters at http://www.jour.sc.edu/news/convergence/. Visit The Convergence Newsletter blog at http://convergencenl.blogspot.com. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Conferences, Training and Call for Papers July 16-17: Journalism in the 21st Century: Between Globalization and National Identity, Melbourne, Australia +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>Featured Articles<<<< Commentary From the Wrong Side of the Digital Divide By Alice Klement, a 2007-2009 Fulbright Scholar in Ethiopia Ethiopia’s technology challenges often start with electricity, or its lack. If belg, moderate “little rains’’ from February to May, fail as they did last year, government rationing of power is likely until the heavy winter rains arrive between July and September. Without these rainfalls, public officials say, the country’s hydroelectric dams controlling the source of the Nile cannot power the capital, let alone the country’s rural areas. Others complain, however, that blackouts are induced, with the government selling rationed power to its neighbor, Sudan. Censorship compounds problems. The Ethiopian government, for example, cut text messaging during the country’s 2005 post-election violence and did not allow service to restart until millennium celebrations in 2007. As laid out in last year's U.S. State Department Human Rights Report: AAU’s graduate program, funded from the start by Norwegian aid, may have experienced its first real challenge to theoretical convergence with its fifth batch of students selected for the academic year 2007-2008. In August, after the governments of Norway and Ethiopia squabbled, Ethiopia asked some Norwegian diplomats to leave. They took with them almost the program’s entire faculty and funding. So the journalism program’s only hope for immediate survival was to converge 33 broadcast and print students into one class on reporting and writing for print, broadcast and online. Oddly enough, under circumstances perhaps unacceptable in more rigid academic circles in Europe or the United States, students came to understand and practice the broad range of skills necessary for successful media convergence. The benefits became obvious during internships, when broadcast students traditionally assigned to ETV crossed media to print at the daily newspaper Addis Neger, for example. U.S. State Department. (2008). 2008 Human Rights Report: Ethiopia. Bureau of Alice Klement was a 2007-2009 Fulbright Scholar in Ethiopia. She can be reached at alice.klement@gmail.com . +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The “Imprisoned” Internet of AAU By Sileshi Yilma, Addis Ababa University Graduate School of Journalism and Communication Student A, who requested anonymity because the issue of access to the Internet is sensitive, recently joined the Graduate School of Development Studies at Addis Ababa University. He often prays so that his teachers will not give him an assignment that requires online research. Heavens, A. (Oct. 8, 2007). You block Blogspot, I block Boing Boing. Accessed June 16, 2009. http://www.meskelsquare.com/archives/2007/10/ethiopia_blocks.html. Open Net Initiative (n.d.) Sub-Saharan Africa. Accessed June 16, 2009. http://opennet.net/research/regions/ssafrica. ONI's specific report on Ethiopia is at http://opennet.net/research/profiles/ethiopia (accessed June 16, 2009). Sileshi Yilma, a first-year student in AAU's Graduate School of Journalism and Communication, has taught English at Haramaya University. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Meeting Media Needs: What You Learn When You Ask Your Students Questions By Dr. John Cokley, University of Queensland Many Western journalism educators, especially those working in convergent media, conduct workshops for their colleagues in developing countries. Nongovernment organizations (in my case the Malaysia-based Asia-Pacific Institute for Broadcasting Development, AIBD) hire us to pass on outside knowledge to locals so that media routines and coverage can be improved. However, the concept of importing improvements may sound a little neo-colonialist to most of us, so this article discusses a practical remedy that can be included in workshop plans and that in the case of an Indian workshop led to new ways of thinking about places where citizen journalism and convergence might occur. In-country workshops can be understood in two main frames:
I adopted the second stance during a five-day convergent journalism workshop in November 2008 for journalists from Prasar Bharati (All India Radio and Doordarshan Television) in Delhi, India, a week before the terrorist attacks in Mumbai. I led the workshop, and the participants were 19 journalists (13 men, six women) from their early 20s to 59 years old, and from a range of bureaus around India including Delhi, Lucknow, Hyderabad, Tiruchirapalli, Silchar, Dehradun, Gorakhpur, Ahmedabad, Dharwad, and Nagpur. Each participant completed a skill and interest audit questionnaire before the workshop commenced and the returns demonstrated a wide range of backgrounds, news worker experience and digital technology skills. The group could be described as a convenience sample representing many journalists around the world who are undergoing technological change (Cokley, 2008, pp.163-164): some ahead, some beginning, some with no experience of digital technology in their workplace at all. The approach as a whole depends on establishing a "constructive alignment" (Biggs, 1999, p. 25) between the students and the course content, which means making what I have to offer as relevant to the participants as possible and as quickly as possible. This is approached using focus group methodology (Kitzinger, 1994, p.103) on days one and two and a three-step "audit, analyze and apply" process based on work explained in Cokley & Eeles (2003) on days three through five. The theoretical foundation – or starting point – is that convergent journalism takes place within networks of both people and equipment (Fornäs et al., 2007, p. 118) and these have to be identified and described in order to be understood and used effectively. The whole group (participants and contractor, interacting as described by Kitzinger, 1994) works through describing the most relevant networks for the workshop. Participants come up to a white board in front of the class and write their contributions at the same time as these are discussed generally. First, Indian media audiences were identified (their perceived interests and news needs, and the media reception and transmission technologies available to them); second, the social and cultural as well as professional networks the journalist-participants observed or were in themselves; and third, the networks (mostly equipment) used by media publishers. Once the discussion is exhausted and all available suggestions have been written on the board, these are recorded (in writing and digital pictures) and discussed later during the workshop as necessary. Within the audience network session, the focus group investigated audiences’ perceived interests and news needs, the in situ technologies (Cokley, 2008), and the public forums available to each audience group. Table 1: data from workshop focus group, India seminar, November 2008 Audience interests and perceived news needs In situ technologies available to audiences Forums available to audiences Weather SMS messaging X 5 Community halls Power interruptions Price rises X 2 Local cable TV networks Queues (in banks, at bus stops, hospitals, movies, railway stations) Bad roads X 2 Street plays Any public gathering (hotels, markets, campuses) District festivals Non-government organizations (NGOs) Chaupals By-elections Documentaries Polls India’s highest TV screens in shopping malls Phone-in programs Serial bomb blasts TV X 4 Point-to-point buses Illegal infiltration Newspapers X 3 Parties / social gatherings Religious terror EDB / kiosks College campuses Economic recession Bus panels Irani hotels (low-cost restaurants known for sandwiches and fast food) Assembly elections Metro (underground rail network) Workplace offices / campuses Right-wing terrorism Out-of-home networks Tea shops Trafficking in women and children Community radio / low-powered FM radio X 3 Toddy shops Cross-border News on phone Parks State separatism in Hyderabad Blogs Pangalles and Murukkan kada in Kerala Nursery admissions (child care) Emails Malls Infrastructure (roads and power) X 3 Internet X 2 Local political meetings Jobs and Bluetooth Self-help groups Tamil issue in southern India Pen drives Citizen journalism sites (www.merinews.com) Share market Landline AVRS (automatic voice-recognition server) www.patentstorm.us/ Resumption policy in Lucknow Voice SMS Films Puppet shows in Ahmedabad Gram mitra (local education officials / programs) Most interesting for this article among the findings are the social-cultural and political forums the Indian journalists identified (Column 3 in Table 1, above). Institutions such as the chaupal, Irani hotels, toddy shops, point-to-point buses, and shops such as Murukkan kada were unknown to me before this workshop. I had been aware of the phenomenon of tea shops (for public discussions), but queues as a regular site for ad hoc discussion had never occurred to me. During the focus group session, an explanation emerged: In a country such as India with so many people (>1 billion) but scarce service resources, queuing is much more prevalent than in Australia, New Zealand, Iran, Singapore, Japan, or the United States, where I have previously conducted observations. Queuing, and the (perhaps inevitable) resulting group discussions, is thus also likely to be observable in countries such as China, Indonesia, Russia, Mexico, Pakistan, Brazil, Bangladesh, and Nigeria where populations are high but resources are scarcer, compared with other high-population countries such as the United States and England. In the same way, the political unit Gaon Sabhas was unknown to me as a site for public discussion and decision-making. The chaupal is worth focusing some attention on. Chaupal is a public space for civil society in India owned by residents of a village: The two-way symmetrical learning design I adopted for this in-country workshop on convergent journalism effectively allowed me to discover new knowledge by exploiting the focus group method’s feature of interaction both among participants and between participants and me, the learning facilitator. The new knowledge gained included identification of chaupals, Gaon Sabhas, Irani hotels, toddy shops, point-to-point buses, shops such as Murukkan kada, tea shops (for public discussions), and queues as a regular site for ad hoc discussion, and useful for inclusion in discussions about sites where convergent journalism could occur. And it became evident that for the participating journalists, the new knowledge lay in the identification of these known cultural concepts as sites for convergent journalism. There are obvious limitations. This study investigated one in-country workshop for 19 broadcast journalists in only one country. But even that experience has proven crucial to later discussions in Australia where I discussed my "discoveries" with international graduate students and learned of similar but culturally specific institutions in other countries. From the small (47,000 square kilometers) landlocked country of Bhutan, north of India with a population about 635,000, journalism master's student Kinley Wangmo (2009, personal communication) told me of women’s associations known as Amtsu Tshogpa, and of civic institutions called Gups and Chimis, which represent similar sites for study. Back from field work in China, social scientist and doctoral candidate Ted RosenBlatt (2009, personal communication) brought forward information about the danwei – a cultural, political and economic work unit at the heart of Chinese society and a very real site for public and private news exchange; and from the United States, Ph.D. candidate Ellen Strickland told me about "the U.S. institution of the town hall meeting" (2009, personal communication; see also Bryan, 2003). In Australia, community hall meetings are not routine participatory communication sites, but in times of natural disaster such as Cyclone Larry in 2009 and the 2009 disastrous fires in the southern state of Victoria, the halls became evident as important media and communications sites. Church services and state fairs in many cultures also start to look like fruitful sites for this research. And given that the Indian workshop was just one of many workshops by a wide range of AIBD contractors in many countries, each adopting a range of educational methodologies, comparisons are open to be drawn in future research and publications. Note also that this article takes no account of the interests and perceived news needs in the first column of Table 1, and these could also be usefully studied. Theoretically and practically, the culturally India-specific concepts of chaupals, Gaon Sabhas,Irani hotels, toddy shops, point-to-point buses, shops such as Murukkan kada, tea shops (for public discussions) and queues, as well as their potential equivalents in Bhutan, China, the U.S. and Australia, constitute regular sites for ad hoc discussion and should be investigated in future studies. Many of the other items in the data set, including news on phone, street plays, puppet shows and AVRS, also offer opportunities for fruitful research. Based on existing literature (Tilley & Cokley,2008) these all appear to be likely candidates for research in citizen journalism as well as convergent journalism, and development and application of these spheres could benefit communities not only in India but elsewhere. References Biggs, John B (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University, Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, Buckingham. Bryan, Frank M. (2003). Real Democracy, The New England Town Meeting and How It Works, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Childers, Linda (1989). ‘J. Grunig’s asymmetrical and symmetrical models of public relations: Contrasting features and ethical dimensions’, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32 (2), 86-93. Cokley, J. (2008). The Application of In Situ Digital Networks to News Reporting and Delivery. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG, Saarbrücken, Germany. Cokley, J. & Eeles, S. (2003). The origin of a species: The distributed newsroom. Australian Studies in Journalism 12, pp. 240-261. Fornäs, J., Becker, K., Bjurström, E,, & Ganetz, H. (2007). Consuming Media: Communication, shopping and everyday life. Berg Publishers, Oxford. Kitzinger, J (1994). The Methodology of Focus Groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health and Illness Vol 16(1):103-121. Mishra, K. (2002). Chaupal as multidimensional public space for civil society in India. Folklore, Public Space and Civil Society. Indira Ghandi National Centre for the Arts, Delhi, Oct 7-11, 2002. Mishra, K. (2004). Chaupal, the earliest human experiment in democracy. Organiser. April 11, 2004. Retrieved Dec. 11, 2008 from http://www.hvk.org/articles/0404/41.html. Rangaswamy, N. (2006). Social Entrepreneurship as Critical Agency: A study of Rural Internet kiosks. Social Proceedings of the International Conference on ICT . Retrieved Dec. 11, 2008 from http://research.microsoft.com/users/nimmir/Papers/Shared%20computing/RangaswamyICTD2006.doc. Slack, F. & Rowley, J. (2005). Notes from the Field. Comparative Technology Transfer and Society, 3(3), 264-266. Tilley, E., & Cokley, J. (2008). Deconstructing the discourse of citizen journalism: Who says what and why it matters. Pacific Journalism Review, 14(1), 94-114. John Cokley teaches in the School of Journalism and Communication at the University of Queensland, Brisbane: St Lucia, Australia. This is an expanded version of an article provided to AIBD in 2008. He can be reached at j.cokley@uq.edu.au. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>Conferences, Training and Calls for Papers<<<< Journalism in the 21st Century: Between Globalization and National Identity Melbourne, Australia July 16-17 http://www.culture-communication.unimelb.edu.au/journalism21st/index.html +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ JEA/NSPA, Intense Journalism Conference University of Minnesota, Minneapolis July 16-18 http://www.studentpress.org/nspa/pdf/nspasws09.pdf +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Western Washington University, Bellingham July 17-18 http://www.wwu.edu/depts/journalism/visualjournalism/ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Tampa, Fla. Aug. 5-6 https://www.eshow2000.com/NABJ/conference_program.cfm +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Boston Aug. 5-8 http://www.aejmc.org/_events/convention/index.php +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ University of Nevada, Reno Nov. 5-6 Call for Papers deadline: June 15 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Washington, D.C. Nov. 12-15 http://www.studentpress.org/nspa/pdf/dcpromo.pdf Seoul, Republic of Korea Nov. 24-26 http://nms.dongguk.ac.kr/iccit09/callforpaper.html?check=paper +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The Convergence Newsletter is free and published by The College of Mass Communications and Information Studies at the University of South Carolina. Executive Editor Doug Fisher dfisher@sc.edu Editor Robert Pyle convedit@mailbox.sc.edu +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>Online<<<< Visit The Convergence Newsletter blog at http://convergencenl.blogspot.com where you can comment on recent articles and keep up with the latest in convergence news. There is also an RSS feed for those who want alternative access. View past and current issues of The Convergence Newsletter athttp://www.jour.sc.edu/news/convergence/. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>Licensing and Redistribution<<<< The Convergence Newsletter is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. This newsletter may be redistributed in any form — print or electronic — without edits or deletion of any content. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>Submission Guidelines/Deadline Schedule<<<< The Convergence Newsletter provides an editorially neutral forum for discussion of the theoretical and professional meaning of media convergence. We welcome articles of all sorts addressing the subject of convergence in journalism and media. We also accept news briefs, book reviews, calls for papers and conference announcements. Our audience is both academics and professionals; the publication style is AP for copy and APA for citations. Feature articles should be 750 to 1,200 words. Other articles should be 250 to 750 words; announcements and conference submissions should be 200 words or less. Please send all articles to The Convergence Newsletter editor at convedit@mailbox.sc.edu along with your name, affiliation and contact information. If you would like to post a position announcement, include a brief description of the position and a link to the complete information. All announcements should be submitted to The Convergence Newsletter editor at convedit@mailbox.sc.edu. The Convergence Newsletter is published the first or second week of each month except January and July. Articles should be submitted by the 15th of the month to be considered for the next month’s issue. Any questions should be sent to convedit@mailbox.sc.edu. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>Subscribe/Information<<<< To subscribe or edit your information, please send a message to convedit@mailbox.sc.edu. You may write to The Convergence Newsletter c/o School of Journalism and Mass Communications, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208. |